Tom O’Neill explores how authoritative figures, particularly Vincent Bugliosi, construct and control public narratives. His investigation into the Manson Family murders challenges Bugliosi’s version of events, as presented in Bugliosi’s bestselling book Helter Skelter, which became the dominant account of the murders. Manson’s supposed motive to incite an apocalyptic race war, “Helter Skelter,” was accepted largely because of Bugliosi’s influence as a prosecutor and his ability to control what evidence was presented during the trial.

O’Neill highlights details Bugliosi chose to omit or manipulate, raising questions about the integrity of the prosecution’s case. For example, Bugliosi downplayed Manson’s connections to Hollywood figures like Terry Melcher and Dennis Wilson, suggesting that there were more personal motives behind the murders than the accepted race war theory. O’Neill points to contradictions in the testimonies of key witnesses and the possibility that Bugliosi tailored the trial’s narrative to ensure a conviction, bolstering his own career in the process. Presenting a sensational motive helped Bugliosi secure a guilty verdict and cemented Manson as a symbol of chaotic evil in American culture. O’Neill asserts that this had two effects: ensuring a victory for the prosecutor and thereby maintaining his power and authority while protecting powerful public figures who might otherwise be implicated in the case.